Home About Us Contact Us Partners Site map

Search: Advanced search
My account    
View cart    

HomeBone Reunion  
Bone Reunion

Bone reunion

Bone Changes Due to Pulses of Direct Electric Microcurrent

Richez, Chamay and Bieler, U. of Geneva:Virchows Arch. Abt. A Path Anat. 357, 11-18 (1972)

Summary: 26 rabbits had platinum electrodes surgically implanted into the medullary cavities of their humerus bones. Microcurrent stimulation was applied at 50 and 250 uA, allowing pause periods of one second between one second treatment bursts. The scientists found that osteogenesis (bone growth) happened more around the cathode (negative polarity), and that slight tissue necrosis occurred around the anode. The tissues stimulated acted as capacitors, discharging 75% of the current absorbed during the rest periods. They concluded that pulsed current is superior to direct current for bone healing acceleration.

Additional Research

Bassett, C. A. L.; Becker, R. O. Generation of electric potentials in bone in response to mechanical stress. Science 137:1063-1064; 1962.
Bassett, C. A. L.; Mitchell, S. N.; Gaston, S. R. Pulsing electromagnetic field treatment in ununited fractures and failed arthrodeses. JAMA 247:623-628; 1982.
Bassett, C. A. L.; Pawluk, R. J.; Becker, R. O. Effect of electric currents on bone in vivo. Nature 204:652-654; 1964.
Bassett, C. A. L.; Pawluk, R. J.; Pilla, A. A. Acceleration of fracture repair by electromagnetic fields. A surgically non-invasive method. Ann. N Y Acad. Sci. 238:242-262; 1974.
Borgens, R. B. Endogenous ionic currents traverse intact and damaged bone. Science 225:478--482; 1984.
Brighton, C. T.; Black, J.; Friedenberg, Z. B.; Esterhai, J. L.; Day, L. J.; Cormoily, J. F. A multicenter study of the treatment of non-union fractures with constant direct current. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 63A:2-12; 1981.
Dealler, S. F. Electrical phenomena associated with bones and fractures and the therapeutic use of electricity in fracture healing. J. Meal. Engin. Technol. 5:73-79; 1981.
Eriksson. C.: Electrical properties of bone. In Bourne. G. H. (ed.): Biochemistry and Physiology of Bone. vol. 4. New York. Academic Press, 1976, pp. 329-384.
Fitton-Jackson, S.; Bassett, C. A. L. The response of skeletal tissues to pulsed magnetic fields. In: Richards, R. J.; Rajah K. T., eds. Use of tissue culture in medical research. Oxford Pergamon Press; 1980:21-46.
Friedenberg, Z. B.; Brighton, C. T. Bioelectricity and fracture healing. Plast. Reconst. Surg. 68:435-443; 1981.
Friedenberg, Z. B.; Roberts, P. G.; Didizian, N.H.; Brighton, C. T. Stimulation of fracture healing by direct current in the rabbit fibula. J. Bone Joint Surg. 53A: 1400-1408; 1971b.
Hamblen, D. L. Scientific basis of present day fracture treatment. J. Roy. Col. Surg. of Ed. 24:340-351; 1979.
Hassler, C. R.; Rykicki, E. F.; Diegle, R. B.; Clark, L. C. Studies of enhanced bone healing via electrical stimuli. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 124:9-19; 1977.
Levy, D. D.; Rubin, B. Inducing bone growth in vivo by pulse stimulation. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 88:218-222; 1972.
Raisz, L. G. Bone metabolism and calcium regulation. Metabolic Bone Dis. 1:1-48; 1977.
Spafaro. J. A.: Electrically stimulated bone growth in animals and man. Review of the literature. Clin. Orthop. 122:325. 1977.
Stan. S.. Muller, J. C.. Sansen. W.. and Dewaele. P.: Effect of direct current on the healing of fractures. In Burney. F.. Herbst, E.. and Hinsenkamp. M. (eds): Electric Stimulation of Bone Growth and Repair. Berlin. Heidelberg. New York, Springer-Verlag. 1978, pp. 47-53.
Wahlstrom, O. Stimulation of fracture healing with electromagnetic fields of extremely low frequency. Clin. Orthop 186:293-298; 1984.
Watson, J. The electrical stimulation of bone healing. Proc. IEEE 67:1339-1351; 1979.


We offer the following Electrotherapy Machines 

Photon Biovibe

Portable Biovibe


FDA Cleared
Wellness Pro 2010