|HI FRUCTOSE CORN SYRUP|
New research shows that there are big differences in how the sugars fructose and glucose are metabolized by your body. Overweight study participants showed more evidence of insulin resistance and other risk factors for heart disease and diabetes when 25 percent of their calories came from fructose-sweetened beverages instead of glucose-sweetened beverages.
A study looked at 32 overweight or obese men and women. Over a 10-week period, they drank either glucose or fructose sweetened beverages totaling 25 percent of their daily calorie intake.
Both the groups gained weight during the trial, but imaging studies revealed that the fructose-consuming group gained more of the dangerous belly fat that has been linked to a higher risk for heart attack and stroke. The fructose group also had higher total cholesterol and LDL ("bad") cholesterol, and greater insulin resistance.
Metabolic Danger of High-Fructose Corn Syrup
By Dana Flavin, MS, MD, PHD
Americans are being poisoned by a common additive present in a wide array of processed foods like soft drinks and salad dressings, commercially made cakes and cookies, and breakfast cereals and brand-name breads.
This commonplace additive silently increases our risk of obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and atherosclerosis.
The name of this toxic additive is high-fructose corn syrup. It is so ubiquitous in processed foods and so over-consumed by the average American that many experts believe our nation faces the prospect of an epidemic of metabolic disease in the future, related in significant degree to excess consumption of high-fructose corn syrup.
The food industry has long known that “a spoonful of sugar helps the medicine go down in the most delightful way.” And cane sugar had been America’s most delightful sweetener of choice, that is, until the 1970s, when the much less expensive corn-derived sweeteners like maltodextrin and high-fructose corn syrup were developed. While regular table sugar (sucrose) is 50% fructose and 50% glucose, high-fructose corn syrup can contain up to 80% fructose and 20% glucose, almost twice the fructose of common table sugar. Both table sugar and high-fructose sweetener contain four calories per gram, so calories alone are not the key problem with high-fructose corn syrup. Rather, metabolism of excess amounts of fructose is the major concern.
The alarming rise in diseases1,2 related to poor lifestyle habits has been mirrored by an equally dramatic increase in fructose consumption, particularly in the form of the corn-derived sweetener, high-fructose corn syrup.3-12 In this article, we’ll examine the evidence for these associations, and we’ll attempt to determine if high-fructose corn syrup is a benign food additive, as the sweetener industry has lobbied us (and the FDA) to believe, or a dangerously overlooked threat to public health.
While cardiovascular disease remains the number one killer in America,1 scientists have noted that “we are experiencing an epidemic of [heart and kidney] disease characterized by increasing rates of obesity, hypertension, the metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and kidney disease.”2 Add to this list a disturbing rise in new cases of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and you have a public health crisis of enormous proportions.
With a growing sense of urgency, scientists are examining the relationship between consumption of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and numerous adverse medical conditions. And they’re coming away with a sour taste in the mouth. Emerging research shows that excessive dietary fructose, largely from consumption of HFCS, represents “an important, but not well-appreciated dietary change,” which has “…rapidly become an important causative factor in the development of the metabolic syndrome,”9 a conglomeration of risk factors that greatly elevates the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Other research suggests that high dietary fructose consumption contributes to obesity and insulin resistance,5,7 encourages kidney stone formation,13 promotes gout,14-17 and is contributing to an upsurge in cases of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.4,18,19 Furthermore, high dietary fructose consumption is associated with increased production of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are linked with the complications of diabetes and with the aging process itself.2,5,7
Stealthy Insertion Into the Food Chain
With little fanfare, and even less scrutiny, HFCS was introduced into the food supply decades ago. It is now commonly found in an astounding array of popular food and beverage products. Sweetened, carbonated soft drinks are considered by many to be the worst offenders.4,7 Food manufacturers embraced HFCS wholeheartedly because it is substantially cheaper than sucrose (table sugar) and mixes well with a variety of products, including beverages, baked goods, jams and jellies, candies, and dairy products. In fact, between 1970 and 1990, the annual intake of HFCS increased by more than 1,000%, greatly exceeding the change in intake of any other food or food group. High-fructose corn syrup is now the primary caloric sweetener added to soft drinks in the United States, and comprises more than 40% of caloric sweeteners added to foods and beverages.20,21
While it is derived from a natural source, HFCS is essentially an unnatural product, in the sense that for most of human history we consumed no more than about 15 grams of fructose per day (approximately one-half ounce), mostly from fruits and vegetables.
In contrast, daily consumption in 1997 was estimated to have increased to 81 grams (nearly three ounces) per day.7 For the first time in history, humans are consuming fructose at extraordinarily high levels.
The Dangers of Fructose
High dietary intake of fructose is problematic because fructose is metabolized differently from glucose. Like fructose, glucose is a simple sugar. Derived from the breakdown of carbohydrates, glucose is a primary source of ready energy. Sucrose (table sugar) comprises one molecule of glucose and one molecule of fructose. Thus, excessive sucrose intake also contributes to the rise in overall daily fructose consumption. Glucose can be metabolized and converted to ATP, which is readily “burned” for energy by the cells’ mitochondria. Alternatively, glucose can be stored in the liver as a carbohydrate for later conversion to energy. Fructose, on the other hand, is more rapidly metabolized in the liver, flooding metabolic pathways and leading to increased triglyceride synthesis and fat storage in the liver. This can cause a rise in serum triglycerides, promoting an atherogenic lipid profile and elevating cardiovascular risk. Increased fat storage in the liver may lead to an increased incidence in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, and this is one of several links between HFCS consumption and obesity as well as the metabolic syndrome.7
Fructose may have less impact on appetite than glucose, so processed foods rich in fructose can contribute to weight gain, obesity, and its related consequences by failing to manage appetite.20 Additionally, loading of the liver with large amounts of fructose leads to increased uric acid formation, which may contribute to gout in susceptible individuals.7
What You Need to Know: Health-Damaging Effects of Excess Dietary Fructose
Fructose Linked With Insulin Resistance and Diabetes
The high flux of fructose to the liver, the main organ capable of metabolizing this simple carbohydrate, disturbs glucose metabolism and uptake pathways and leads to metabolic disturbances that underlie the induction of insulin resistance,9 a hallmark of type 2 diabetes.
In fact, the effect of HFCS on insulin resistance has been shown to have an impact on the prevalence of diabetes. In 2004, investigators conducted an ecological correlation study, in which they compared the relationship between food consumption of refined carbohydrates and the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the US from 1909 to 1997. They found that during this period, the use of corn syrup sweeteners, which were almost non-existent at the turn of the century, increased by more than 2,100%. During the same period, the prevalence of diabetes skyrocketed. After controlling for total energy intake from other foods such as fats and proteins, only the increase in corn syrup and a decrease in fiber intake correlated positively with the prevalence of type 2 diabetes.22
Scientists have therefore come to realize that all sugars are not created equal, which has been borne out
in a number of studies. In one study, investigators looked at whether reduction in insulin sensitivity was caused by glucose or fructose components of the diet. They took two groups of young healthy men and fed one group a high-glucose diet, while the other received a diet high in fructose. At the end of one week, high-fructose feeding was accompanied by a significant reduction in insulin sensitivity and insulin binding, whereas no significant changes were seen in the high-glucose group.23
Another study found that diets containing a moderate amount of fructose produced undesirable changes in glucose metabolism in both normal and hyper-insulinemic men.24
Strategies to Prevent or Minimize Dangers of Excess Dietary Fructose
Today, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) hasbecome nearly ubiquitous in the food supply. The sticky stuff features prominently in everything from packaged cereals and convenience drinks to ketchup and baked goods. Sugary soft drinks are thought to be the single largest source of this fructose-rich sweetener.
The best way to avoid the dangers of excess dietary fructose is to avoid foods with added sugars as well as processed or pre-packaged foods and undiluted fruit juices. Instead, focus on a heart-healthy diet—such as the Mediterranean diet, which emphasizes whole grains, fresh vegetables, low-fat dairy, fresh fish, and limited meat.
Other tips to protect yourself against the danger of excess fructose include:
Very few people realize that excess fructose intake may contribute to hypertension.25 High blood pressure is a well-known comorbidity associated with obesity, hyperinsulinemia, and hyperlipidemia.12 Hypertension is part of a cluster of dangerous disorders called the metabolic syndrome, which is characterized by insulin resistance and is a key factor in the development of many vascular diseases.
Excess fructose contributes to hypertension by inhibiting a key enzyme called endothelial nitric oxide synthase,26 which is located in blood vessels walls and is essential for the production of the vasodilator, nitric oxide. By allowing healthy blood vessels to relax and ensuring smooth blood flow in vessels, nitric oxide is absolutely necessary for preventing hypertension, coronary artery disease, and erectile dysfunction.
Atherogenic Lipid Profiles and Coronary Artery Disease
Unlike glucose, fructose is readily converted to fat by the liver, leading to an excessive concentration of fats and lipoproteins in the body.9 High and prolonged fructose ingestion increases unfavorable lipid profiles in the body. By increasing triglyceride levels12,27—an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease—fructose promotes potentially dangerous lipoprotein changes that increase atherogenic risk. For example, fructose increases apoB100—the primary lipoprotein responsible for carrying cholesterol to the tissues—which leads to the formation of fatty deposits. Conversely, high-density lipoprotein (HDL), which is responsible for carrying cholesterol particles back to the liver to be eliminated, is decreased by fructose.28 Fructose ingestion therefore contributes to fat deposits in the liver (fatty liver)7 and increases the amount of dangerous lipoproteins that enhance cholesterol deposits in blood vessels walls.29 This can lead to plaque buildup and narrowing of the blood vessels—a ticking time bomb for the development of both stroke and heart attack.
Potential Consequences of Excess Dietary Fructose Consumption
– Retinopathy (may lead to blindness)
– Nephropathy (may lead to severe kidney disease, requiring chronic dialysis)
– Neuropathy (may involve numbness, pain, impotence, speech impairment, loss of bladder control, etc.)
Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease
Once a relatively rare clinical oddity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is now estimated to affect 20-30% of adult populations in developed countries.19 Like obesity and diabetes, the rise in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease cases has paralleled the rise in consumption of dietary fructose.4 For example, a recent study by scientists at the University of Florida, Gainesville, determined that fructose consumption in patients with established non-alcoholic fatty liver disease was about two to three-fold higher than among normal control subjects.4
As its name suggests, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is a constellation of conditions affecting the liver, characterized by excessive accumulation of fat in the organ, and unrelated to alcoholism. It is associated with higher rates of death from liver diseases, such as cirrhosis and liver cancer, and with cardiovascular disease.30-32 It is intimately linked to insulin resistance and the metabolic syndrome, and often progresses to an inflammatory condition known as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.33
The AGE Connection
The adverse effects of excess dietary fructose are not limited to detrimental effects on blood sugar meta-bolism, lipid profiles, or liver health. Excess fructose also encourages the formation of toxic advanced glycation end products (AGEs). These are aberrant hybrid proteins, formed when sugars and lipids react with these molecules, altering their structures and damaging their functionality. As AGEs accumulate they encourage inflammation and oxidative stress. They have also been linked to accelerated aging. Advanced glycation end products are believed to play a key role in the development of hypertension as well as complications associated with type 2 diabetes like neuropathy and retinopathy.5,7,34-37 Neuropathy afflicts the nerves and can cause tingling, prickling sensations, numbness, and pain, while retinopathy damages the eye’s retina and may lead to blindness.
In terms of the reactions that lead to the development of AGEs, fructose is far more reactive than glucose, so even a small amount of fructose circulating in the bloodstream is potentially damaging. In the laboratory, it has been shown that the rate of fructose/protein cross-linking is 10 times greater than the linkage rate associated with glucose.38 This suggests that excess dietary fructose is intimately linked to accelerated aging, as this type of protein cross-linking is a common manifestation of aging.7,39-41
These aging-accelerating effects of dietary sugars were investigated in lab rats fed diets featuring sucrose, glucose, or fructose. Three measures of aging, including the cross-linking of collagen (a protein that provides structure and support for the skin and other tissues), were each significantly greater in rats that were fed fructose than rats that consumed glucose or sucrose. “The data suggest that long-term fructose consumption induces adverse effects on aging,” concluded researchers.42
Advanced glycation end products are also known to induce acute endothelial dysfunction.43 Endothelial dysfunction is implicated in the development of atherosclerosis, and thus cardiovascular disease.44 Scientists also believe that AGEs may contribute to the development and progression of chronic heart failure by inducing vascular and myocardial stiffening.45
Supplements that May Protect Against Fructose-Induced Damage
Excessive intake of dietary fructose from sources such as high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) may contribute to myriad adverse health effects ranging from metabolic syndrome to kidney stones to the complications of diabetes. In addition to limiting exposure to dietary fructose, nutritional supplements may offer important protection against these harmful effects.
Protect against Advanced Glycation End Products.
Fructose promotes the formation of advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are clearly linked to some of the worst side effects of diabetes.5,50 Advanced glycation end products are also linked to accelerated aging, even among the healthy.7,39,40
Fight the Metabolic Syndrome. Excessive fructose intake is intimately linked with metabolic syndrome and its components such as elevated triglycerides, high blood pressure, and increased cardiovascular risk.
Reduce the Risk of Elevated Uric Acid Blood Level. High dietary intake of fructose—particularly in the form of HFCS—is associated with elevated blood levels of uric acid, which are linked with gout.
Uric Acid Elevation, Gout, and Kidney Stones
A recent study by Canadian researchers clearly shows that drinking high-fructose sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with elevated blood levels of uric acid. Known as hyperuricemia, this condition is incontrovertibly linked to elevated risk of suffering from the painful joint disease, gout. Researchers drew their conclusions based on data gathered from nearly 15,000 adult Americans who participated in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988-1994). “Serum uric acid levels increased with increasing sugar-sweetened soft drink intake,” wrote the scientists. Tellingly, drinking diet soft drinks, which do not contain HFCS, was not associated with elevated uric acid levels.15
“Fructose-induced hyperuricemia might have a causal role in metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and other chronic disease,” noted Harvard-based scientists in 2007.46 In 2008, Canadian researchers narrowed the focus of their previous inquiries, examining the relationship between soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the risk of gout in men. In this study, more than 46,000 men with no history of gout were followed for a dozen years. Writing in the influential British Medical Journal, they concluded: “Prospective data suggest that consumption of sugar-sweetened soft drinks and fructose is strongly associated with an increased risk of gout in men.”17
In a recent study, researchers at Harvard Medical School analyzed data gathered from literally hundreds of thousands of subjects, comparing fructose intake with risk of developing kidney stones. While “non-fructose carbohydrates” were not associated with increased risk, the relative risks of kidney stones “significantly increased” for subjects with the highest intake of dietary fructose, compared with subjects who had the lowest intake. It should be noted that sucrose (table sugar) acts as a source of dietary fructose, as it comprises fructose and glucose. “Our study suggests that fructose intake is independently associated with an increased risk of incident kidney stones,” researchers concluded.13 This information is so new few scientists have had time to even attempt to replicate it. But the enormous sample size of the study, and the prestige of its authors, lends credence to the results.
Abnormally elevated levels of blood uric acid have been cited as one potential mechanism by which HFCS precipitates the undesirable metabolic changes leading to conditions such as the metabolic syndrome.47,48 It is likely that this fructose-driven increase in serum uric acid also plays a role in the increased risk of kidney stones. The ability of fructose to induce an increase in uric acid may be a major mechanism by which fructose can cause cardiorenal (heart and kidney) disease.
High-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) quietly and grimly entered the food supply decades ago. Today HFCS is ubiquitous in a wide variety of foods, including pasta sauces and salad dressings.
High-fructose corn syrup has been linked to an increased risk of a broad range of metabolic diseases and conditions. Fructose is preferentially stored in the liver as fat, and is associated with abnormal spikes in blood levels of uric acid.
High levels of fructose consumption are also associated with the development of AGEs, which, in turn, are linked to accelerated aging and some of the worst side effects associated with type 2 diabetes. Despite assurances of safety by the corn sweetener industry, prudent health-conscious consumers would do well to decrease their intake of sweeteners containing HFCS. The nutritional content of HFCS offers “empty calories” - calorie-dense, with no micronutrient (e.g. vitamins, minerals, phytonutrients) value. Because sucrose (table sugar) is half fructose, intake of this sweetener should also be limited whenever possible. The best way to reduce your intake of high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) is to read the label of food products before you purchase them. One can slash their dietary intake of HFCS by avoiding foods that contain it and other added sugars such as sucrose.
Dana Flavin, MS, MD, PhD is former science assistant to the associate bureau director for toxicology at the FDA.
If you have any questions on the scientific content of this article, please call a Life Extension Health Advisor at 1-800-226-2370
1. Rugg SS, Bailey AL, Browning SR. Preventing cardiovascular disease in Kentucky: epidemiology, trends, and strategies for the future. J Ky Med Assoc. 2008 Apr;106(4):149-61.
2. Johnson RJ, Segal MS, Sautin Y, et al. Potential role of sugar (fructose) in the epidemic of hypertension, obesity and the metabolic syndrome, diabetes, kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Oct;86(4):899-906.
3. Forshee RA, Storey ML, Allison DB, et al. A critical examination of the evidence relating high fructose corn syrup and weight gain. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2007;47(6):561-82.
4. Ouyang X, Cirillo P, Sautin Y, et al. Fructose consumption as a risk factor for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2008 Jun;48(6):993-9.
5. Miller A, Adeli K. Dietary fructose and the metabolic syndrome. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008 Mar;24(2):204-9.
6. Rutledge AC, Adeli K. Fructose and the metabolic syndrome: pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms. Nutr Rev. 2007 Jun;65(6 Pt 2):S13-23.
7. Gaby AR. Adverse effects of dietary fructose. Altern Med Rev. 2005 Dec;10(4):294-306.
8. Nakagawa T, Tuttle KR, Short RA, Johnson RJ. Hypothesis: fructose-induced hyperuricemia as a causal mechanism for the epidemic of the metabolic syndrome. Nat Clin Pract Nephrol. 2005 Dec;1(2):80-6.
9. Basciano H, Federico L, Adeli K. Fructose, insulin resistance, and metabolic dyslipidemia. Nutr Metab (Lond). 2005 Feb 21;2(1):5.
10. Rayssiguier Y, Gueux E, Nowacki W, Rock E, Mazur A. High fructose consumption combined with low dietary magnesium intake may increase the incidence of the metabolic syndrome by inducing inflammation. Magnes Res. 2006 Dec;19(4):237-43.
11. Segal MS, Gollub E, Johnson RJ. Is the fructose index more relevant with regards to cardiovascular disease than the glycemic index? Eur J Nutr. 2007 Oct;46(7):406-17.
12. Elliott SS, Keim NL, Stern JS, Teff K, Havel PJ. Fructose, weight gain, and the insulin resistance syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Nov;76(5):911-22.
13. Taylor EN, Curhan GC. Fructose consumption and the risk of kidney stones. Kidney Int. 2008 Jan;73(2):207-12.
14. Johnson RJ, Sautin YY, Oliver WJ, et al. Lessons from comparative physiology: could uric acid represent a physiologic alarm signal gone awry in western society? J Comp Physiol [B]. 2008 Jul 23.
15. Choi JW, Ford ES, Gao X, Choi HK. Sugar-sweetened soft drinks, diet soft drinks, and serum uric acid level: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Arthritis Rheum. 2008 Jan 15;59(1):109-16.
16. Hak AE, Choi HK. Lifestyle and gout. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2008 Mar;20(2):179-86.
17. Choi HK, Curhan G. Soft drinks, fructose consumption, and the risk of gout in men: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2008 Feb 9;336(7639):309-12.
18. Thuy S, Ladurner R, Volynets V, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in humans is associated with increased plasma endotoxin and plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 concentrations and with fructose intake. J Nutr. 2008 Aug;138(8):1452-5.
19. Preiss D, Sattar N. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an overview of prevalence, diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment considerations. Clin Sci (Lond). 2008 Sep;115(5):141-50.
20. Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Apr;79(4):537-43.
21. Vos MB, Kimmons JE, Gillespie C, Welsh J, Blanck HM. Dietary fructose consumption among US children and adults: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Medscape J Med. 2008 Jul 9;10(7):160.
22. Gross LS, Li L, Ford ES, Liu S. Increased consumption of refined carbohydrates and the epidemic of type 2 diabetes in the United States: an ecologic assessment. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 May;79(5):774-9.
23. Beck-Nielsen H, Pedersen O, Lindskov HO. Impaired cellular insulin binding and insulin sensitivity induced by high-fructose feeding in normal subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. 1980 Feb;33(2):273-8.
24. Hallfrisch J, Ellwood KC, Michaelis OE 4th, Reiser S, O’Dorisio TM, Prather ES. Effects of dietary fructose on plasma glucose and hormone responses in normal and hyperinsulinemic men. J Nutr. 1983 Sep;113(9):1819-26.
25. Hsieh PS, Tai YH, Loh CH, Shih KC, Cheng WT, Chu CH. Functional interaction of AT1 and AT2 receptors in fructose-induced insulin resistance and hypertension in rats. Metabolism. 2005 Feb;54(2):157-64.
26. Plante GE, Perreault M, Lanthier A, Marette A, Maheux P. Reduction of endothelial NOS and bradykinin-induced extravasation of macromolecules in skeletal muscle of the fructose-fed rat model. Cardiovasc Res. 2003 Oct 1;59(4):963-70.
27. Avramoglu RK, Qiu W, Adeli K. Mechanisms of metabolic dyslipidemia in insulin resistant states: deregulation of hepatic and intestinal lipoprotein secr